Position in chronology
Tiglath-pileser I 1003
Not yet translated
This tablet is catalogued with its transliteration and photographed, but no published translation exists yet. Our translation engine works through the untranslated corpus every night, oldest first — this page will update the day its turn comes. If you are a specialist and can read it, we would love your help.
Why it matters
One of the surviving manuscript witnesses to a royal inscription of Tiglath-pileser I, preserving Assyrian royal ideology and titulary from the height of Middle Assyrian imperial power.
Transliteration
[...] x [...] / [...] x ù [...] / [...] ⸢šá?⸣ gi x [...] / [...].⸢MEŠ?⸣-ni ⸢ša?⸣ [...] / [...]-x-šu-nu [...] / [...]-e ù diš₈-tàr ⸢ra⸣-[i-mi-ia? ...] / [...] mu-ud-ba-ri ù [...] / [...]-x-te-šu-nu lu ša [...] / [...] di-ik-ta-šu-nu [...] / [...] ⸢e⸣-zi-ib ṣar-⸢bi⸣-[iš ...] / [... x] 16 ME MUNUS.[...] / [...] ⸢a⸣-ra-a-⸢tú?⸣ [...]
Scholarly note
Royal inscription of an Assyrian king, published in the Royal Inscriptions of Assyria online project (RIAo). Translation reproduced from the ORACC edition. ORACC text Q005958.
Attribution
Image: BM 123391 (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.earth/artifacts, P422476). source
Translation excerpted from Royal Inscriptions of Assyria online (RIAo), Munich Open-access Cuneiform Corpus Initiative (MOCCI), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; in association with the RINAP Project, University of Pennsylvania. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/riao/Q005958/.
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
An early witness to systematic administrative notation at Kish. Its signs and numerals can be catalogued, but that does not establish a full translation or prove that it is the world's first writing.
An early surviving historical monument that joins named rulers, a territorial dispute and religious oaths. It shows how a city-state turned victory into a lasting public claim, without establishing that this was the first recorded conflict.