Position in chronology
Tiglath-pileser I 12
About this tablet
A broken clay tablet from the royal library at Nineveh (K.2807) preserving part of the annals of Tiglath-pileser I, king of Assyria around 1100 BCE. The surviving lines boast of a campaign against rebellious cities in the mountain land of Qummēnu, which had cut off their tribute to the god Aššur — territory, the king claims, that no previous Assyrian ruler had ever penetrated. It is a classic specimen of Assyrian royal rhetoric: conquest framed as divine service, and novelty ('no king before me') as a measure of glory.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
Only scraps survive. The king has just been dealing with Babylonia and brought something back to his capital, Aššur. Then he turns to the cities of the land of Qummēnu, which had stopped paying their tribute and gifts owed to the god Aššur, his lord — a region that had never known submission and that no king before him had ever entered. So he called up his chariots and his army and marched out; the city of Matqi'u is mentioned next, but the tablet breaks off there and the rest of the campaign is lost.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engine(Obverse, fragmentary) [... the land Kardun]iash (Babylonia) [...] [... I] brou[ght to my city] Aššur [...] [...]-irdi, cities of the land Qum[mēnu (...)], [which] withheld [...], which [had held back] tribute and impos[ts from the god Aššur, my lord, which from most ancient days] had not known submission, into whose midst no king wh[o preceded] me had ever gone — I mustered [my ch]ariots and my troops. [...] ... the city Matqi'u ... (remainder broken)
Our translation engine — Fable 5. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Engine notes
read from photo8 uncertain terms ↓
- KUR.kar-du-ni-áš — Karduniaš: standard Neo-Assyrian designation for Babylonia; partially broken at left edge, restoration tentative.
- KUR.qum-me-ni — Qummeni: a land/region in the upper Tigris area; restoration uncertain, signified by '?' in transliteration.
- i-kal-lu-ni — From kalû, 'to withhold/detain'; subject and object supplied from context and parallel passages.
- GUN ù ta-mar-ta — GUN = biltu, 'tribute'; ta-mar-tu, 'audience gift / greeting gift' — a standard paired phrase in royal annals.
- iš-tu UD ṣa-a-te — Literally 'from distant/remote days'; a formulaic phrase. ṣâtu can mean 'distant time' or 'remote past'; well-attested in Tiglath-pileser I contexts.
- ka-na-ša — Infinitive of kanāšu, 'to submit/be submissive'; here as object of 'know' (idû). Standard royal annals idiom.
- a-lik pa-ni-ia — Literally 'one who went before me' — conventional term for royal predecessor(s); restoration is standard for this formula.
- URU.ma-at-qi-ú — City name; reading uncertain, possibly Matqiu or a variant; sign sequence only partially preserved.
Reasoning ↓
The photograph shows two main fragments of a clay tablet (museum number K.2807, labelled 'T-P.' — i.e. Tiglath-pileser — on the edge view), both with densely inscribed Assyrian cuneiform. The obverse (upper fragment) preserves multiple lines of relatively fine, closely-spaced wedges; the reverse or lower fragment (bottom set of images) is more damaged with surface erosion and a circular hole/drill mark visible. At this image resolution the individual signs are extremely difficult to read with confidence: some horizontal and diagonal wedges are discernible in the upper fragment, consistent with Neo-Assyrian royal-annals script, but I cannot independently verify or correct specific signs against the provided transliteration. The transliteration is drawn from the ORACC edition of Tiglath-pileser I Inscription 12 (Q005937). The text appears to be a fragmentary passage from royal annals describing withheld tribute from Karduniaš (Babylonia) and/or Qummeni, followed by a military muster — a pattern well attested in Tiglath-pileser I's annals (cf. RIMA 2, A.0.87.1). Significant portions of the beginning of each line are broken, supplied here as conjectural restorations in square brackets following standard scholarly practice.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 · prompt 2026-05-11/v3-conventions · May 11, 2026 · 3280 in / 974 out tokens
Why it matters
Lists fourteen conquered cities in the lands of Qumanî and Ḫabḫu — territories whose rulers had withheld tribute from Aššur — supplying rare toponymic evidence for Assyrian expansion into the northern periphery under Tiglath-pileser I.
Transliteration
[... KUR.kar-du?]-ni-⸢áš⸣ [...] / [... a-na URU-ia] da-⸢šur ub⸣-[la (...)] / [...]-ir-di URU.MEŠ-ni ša KUR.⸢qum⸣-[me-ni? (...)] / [... i]-⸢kal⸣-lu-ni ša GUN ù ta-⸢mar⸣-[ta] / [a-na da-šur EN-ia ik-lu-ú? ša iš-tu UD ṣa-a-te? la i]-⸢du⸣-ú ka-na-ša ša MAN a-ia-⸢um⸣-[ma] / [a-lik pa-ni]-⸢ia⸣ a-na lìb-be-šu-nu la il-li-⸢ku⸣ / [... GIŠ].GIGIR.MEŠ ù ERIM.ḪI.A.MEŠ-ia ad-⸢ke⸣ / [...] x URU.ma-at-qi-ú…
Scholarly note
Royal inscription of an Assyrian king, published in the Royal Inscriptions of Assyria online project (RIAo). Translation reproduced from the ORACC edition. ORACC text Q005937.
Attribution
Image: BM — (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.earth/artifacts, P394687). source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-fable-5 (2026-07-12/v7-evolved).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.