Position in chronology
Esarhaddon 1008
Translation — scholar edition
RINAP 4(1') [... and (my) victory] (and) my [conqu]est [I had written upon it and] I set (it) up [for all time for the admira]tion of [all (my) enemies]. (4') [Whoever takes away this stele from] its [p]lace [and erases my inscr]ibed [name and wri]tes [his name, cov]ers (it) [with dirt, throws (it) into water, burns (it) w]ith fire, [...]
Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period, volume 4 — scholar edition (ORACC).
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Transliteration
[... ù li-i-tú ki-šit-ti] ⸢ŠU.II-ía?⸣ / [EDIN-uš-šú ú-šá-áš-ṭir-ma ana tab]-rat / [kiš-šat na-ki-ri ana ṣa-at u₄-me] ul-ziz / [šá NA₄.NA.RÚ.A šú-a-tú TA] ⸢áš⸣-ri-šú / [ú-nak-kar-u-ma šu-mì ša]-aṭ-ru / [i-pa-ši-ṭu-ma MU-šú i-šaṭ]-ṭa-ru / [lu-u ina e-pe-ri i-kàt]-ta-mu / [lu-u ina A.MEŠ i-nam-du-u lu-u] ⸢ina IZI⸣ / [...] (blank) [...]
Scholarly note
Royal inscription of Esarhaddon, edited by Erle Leichty (RINAP 4, 2011). ORACC text Q003380.
Attribution
Image: Created by Erle Leichty, and the Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period (RINAP) Project, 2011. Lemmatized by Jamie Novotny, 2010. The annotated edition is released under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license 3.0. Please cite this page as http://oracc.org/rinap/Q003380/..
Translation excerpted from Leichty, E. 2011. The Royal Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (680–669 BC). RINAP 4. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/rinap/rinap4/Q003380/.
Related tablets
Related sources
An early example of administrative writing from Uruk. Its fragmentary numerical entries and commodity signs document record-keeping during the formative period of writing.
An early witness to systematic administrative notation at Kish. Its signs and numerals can be catalogued, but that does not establish a full translation or prove that it is the world's first writing.
An early surviving historical monument that joins named rulers, a territorial dispute and religious oaths. It shows how a city-state turned victory into a lasting public claim, without establishing that this was the first recorded conflict.