SAA 12 044. Fragment of Aššur-etel-ilani Grant (NARGD 25)

~700 BCE·Neo-Assyrian·P336270

Translation — scholar edition

SAA 12

High confidence

(1) [Aššur-etel-ilani, mighty king, king of the world], king [of Assyria; son of Assurbanipal, ki]ng of the world, king of Assy[ria, overseer; son of Esarhaddon, king of the world, king of Assyria, likewise overseer; son of Sargon (II), king of the world], king of Sumer and [Akkad]. (royal seal impression) (Rest destroyed)

State Archives of Assyria, volume 12 — scholar edition (ORACC).

Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.

Transliteration

[mAN.ŠÁR—NIR.GÁL-DINGIR-MEŠ LUGAL dan-nu LUGAL ŠÚ LUGAL KUR—AN.ŠÁR.KI PA-lum] / [DUMU mAN.ŠÁR—DÙ—A LUGAL ŠÚ] ⸢LUGAL⸣ [KUR—AN.ŠÁR.KI PA-lum] / [DUMU mAN.ŠÁR—PAB—AŠ] ⸢LUGAL⸣ ŠÚ LUGAL KUR—⸢AN⸣.[ŠÁR.KI PA-lum-ma] / [DUMU mLUGAL—GI.NA LUGAL ŠÚ LUGAL KUR.EME.KU] ù [URI.KI]

Scholarly note

Royal grant, decree or gift inscription of the Neo-Assyrian period, edited by Laura Kataja & Robert Whiting (SAA 12, 1995). ORACC text P336270.

Attribution

Image: BM — (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.earth/artifacts, P336270). source
Translation excerpted from Kataja, L. & Whiting, R. 1995. Grants, Decrees and Gifts of the Neo-Assyrian Period. SAA 12. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/saa12/P336270/.

Related tablets

Related sources

~3200 BCE

Proto-Cuneiform Account Tablet (VAT 15211)

An early example of administrative writing from Uruk. Its fragmentary numerical entries and commodity signs document record-keeping during the formative period of writing.

~3100 BCE

Kish Tablet

An early witness to systematic administrative notation at Kish. Its signs and numerals can be catalogued, but that does not establish a full translation or prove that it is the world's first writing.

~2450 BCE

Stele of the Vultures

An early surviving historical monument that joins named rulers, a territorial dispute and religious oaths. It shows how a city-state turned victory into a lasting public claim, without establishing that this was the first recorded conflict.