CDLJ 2007/1 §3.50

Not yet translated

This tablet is catalogued with its transliteration and photographed, but no published translation exists yet. Our translation engine works through the untranslated corpus every night, oldest first — this page will update the day its turn comes. If you are a specialist and can read it, we would love your help.

The world it comes from

Nebuchadnezzar, exile, late astronomy.

Read the Neo-Babylonian chapter →

From the same catalogue range (near P368401)

P368400 · ~580 BCE

CDLJ 2007/1 §3.49

P368403 · ~580 BCE

RINBE 1, Nebuchadnezzar II nn, ex. nn

P368398 · ~1800 BCE

CDLJ 2007/1 §3.47

P368404 · ~580 BCE

Die neubabylonischen Königsinschriften 140-141, Nebuchadnezzar no. 16

Transliteration

na3-nig2#-du#-uri3# _lugal_ babilax(KA2.MIN|) [za-nin]
e2-sag#-il2#-[u3] e2-zi-da _ibila sag-[kal]_
sza na3-a-[uri3] _lugal#_ babilax(KA2.MIN|)#[]

Scholarly note

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Neo-Babylonian (ca. 626-539 BC)) — CDLJ 2007/1 §3.50. This record has no stored scholarly English translation; the existence of published translations has not been checked; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

Attribution

Image: Kalamazoo Valley Museum, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA (P368401) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from CDLI raw catalogue, no English translation stored at ingestion. P-number P368401..

Related tablets

Related sources

~3200 BCE

Proto-Cuneiform Account Tablet (VAT 15211)

An early example of administrative writing from Uruk. Its fragmentary numerical entries and commodity signs document record-keeping during the formative period of writing.

~3100 BCE

Kish Tablet

An early witness to systematic administrative notation at Kish. Its signs and numerals can be catalogued, but that does not establish a full translation or prove that it is the world's first writing.

~2450 BCE

Stele of the Vultures

An early surviving historical monument that joins named rulers, a territorial dispute and religious oaths. It shows how a city-state turned victory into a lasting public claim, without establishing that this was the first recorded conflict.