Position in chronology
RINBE 1, Nebuchadnezzar II nn, ex. nn
Not yet translated
This tablet is catalogued with its transliteration and photographed, but no published translation exists yet. Our translation engine works through the untranslated corpus every night, oldest first — this page will update the day its turn comes. If you are a specialist and can read it, we would love your help.
From the same catalogue range (near P248469)
Transliteration
[ki-it-nu-szu-ma ip-pu-szu re]-e#-szu#-su#-[un] [na-a-dam] mu-usz-te-me-qu i-tu-ti ku-un _sza3 dingir gal-gal_ [_ibila_ a]-sza#-re-du szu na-bi-um-ibila-u2-s,ur szar ba!-bi-lam a-na-ku [i3-nu-um] marduk _EN_ ra-bi2-u3 ki-ni-isz ib-ba-an-ni-ma [_ma-da_] szu-te-szu-ru ni-szim ri-e2-a-am [za-na-an ma]-ha#-za ud-du-szu e!-esz-re-e-tim [ra-bi-isz u2]-ma#-'-ir-an#-[ni] u2#?-[na-am-mi-ir? ki-ma u4-um] e2-temen-an#-[ki zi-ku-ra-at ba-bi-lam] e-esz-szi-[isz e-pu2-usz] e2-zi-da# [_e2_ ki-i-nim na-ra-am na-bi-um] i-na ba#-[ar-zi-pa3 e-esz-szi-isz ab-ni-ma] i#-[na _ku3-sig17_ u3 ni-si3-iq-tim _na4-na4_]
Scholarly note
Catalogue entry from CDLI (Neo-Babylonian (ca. 626-539 BC)) — RINBE 1, Nebuchadnezzar II nn, ex. nn. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).
Attribution
Image: Hearst Museum of Anthropology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA (P248469) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from CDLI raw catalogue, no published translation. P-number P248469..
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
An early witness to systematic administrative notation at Kish. Its signs and numerals can be catalogued, but that does not establish a full translation or prove that it is the world's first writing.
An early surviving historical monument that joins named rulers, a territorial dispute and religious oaths. It shows how a city-state turned victory into a lasting public claim, without establishing that this was the first recorded conflict.