Position in chronology
Sennacherib's Annals (Taylor Prism)
Translation — curated editorial
EditorialAs to Hezekiah the Judean, who did not submit to my yoke — I surrounded forty-six of his strong cities, walled forts and countless small villages in their vicinity, and conquered them by means of well-stamped ramps and battering rams… Hezekiah himself I shut up in Jerusalem, his royal city, like a bird in a cage…
Editorial entry — translation cited from: Luckenbill, Annals of Sennacherib (1924); Grayson & Novotny, Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period vol. 3 (2012)
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Why it matters
One of the rare cuneiform texts that explicitly cross-references the Hebrew Bible: the same historical event narrated by both sides. The Taylor Prism gives us the Assyrian view of a moment the biblical authors framed as divine deliverance. It is also a masterpiece of imperial propaganda — the prismatic shape allows the text to be read on six faces, the cuneiform is meticulous, the rhetoric calibrated to terrify potential rebels.
Transliteration
ana Hazaqiyahu Yaudaya lā kānish ana nīriya alme-šuma… (Akkadian, hexagonal-prism royal annal text)
Scholarly note
A hexagonal clay prism inscribed with the official annals of Sennacherib, king of Assyria (704–681 BCE), covering eight military campaigns including the famous 701 BCE siege of Jerusalem under King Hezekiah of Judah. The Taylor Prism is the most complete of three surviving copies; the parallel account in the Hebrew Bible (2 Kings 18–19, Isaiah 36–37) describes the same campaign from the Judean perspective. Sennacherib's text notably does NOT claim to have taken Jerusalem itself — only to have besieged Hezekiah within it.
Attribution
Image: British Museum, BM 91032 (Taylor Prism) · imagery to be sourced at next ingestion pass.
Translation excerpted from Luckenbill, Annals of Sennacherib (1924); Grayson & Novotny, Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period vol. 3 (2012).
Related tablets
Related sources
An early example of administrative writing from Uruk. Its fragmentary numerical entries and commodity signs document record-keeping during the formative period of writing.
An early witness to systematic administrative notation at Kish. Its signs and numerals can be catalogued, but that does not establish a full translation or prove that it is the world's first writing.
An early surviving historical monument that joins named rulers, a territorial dispute and religious oaths. It shows how a city-state turned victory into a lasting public claim, without establishing that this was the first recorded conflict.