MDP 06, 260

Visual examination of the photograph: the tablet is a small, roughly oval clay fragment shown from multiple angles (obverse, reverse, and edges). The surface is heavily eroded and pitted with fine cracks and surface loss. On the obverse (upper main image), several rows of impressed and incised wedges are visible. In the upper register I can make out groups of sign-like impressions that are consistent with the complex logographic signs described in the transliteration (e.g., crossed or hatched sign clusters plausibly matching M262 or M096 types), and horizontal strokes that look like simple numerical tallies (N01 type). The middle register shows a series of clearly impressed horizontal lines, consistent with repeated N01 numerals. The lower register is more damaged and harder to read. The reverse (lower main image) appears largely blank or bears no surviving inscription, consistent with a simple obverse-only administrative tablet. Side views show the tablet's thinness and edge damage. Overall visual reading broadly aligns with the provided transliteration: numerical impressions are visible, complex signs are present in the upper area, and significant lacunae (broken edges top and bottom) explain the square brackets. However, at this resolution and given the erosion, I cannot verify individual sign identities (M302~s, M288, M262, M096, M056~e) with any confidence — they are plausible but not confirmable from the photo alone. The museum number 'Sb 15108' is legible on the reverse label. This is a transliteration-anchored reading with limited visual confirmation.