Sumerian·Book

Position in chronology

CUSAS 01, 162

~3100 BCE·Uruk Period·P325250

About this tablet

A small, heavily damaged clay tablet from the Uruk period (roughly 3200–3000 BCE), bearing what appears to be an early administrative record involving the distribution or apportionment of commodities — possibly rations of beer, plant goods, or libation vessels — across different categories of personnel including women, children, and a high-status official denoted by the EN sign. This is among the earliest writing in human history, produced at a time when cuneiform script was still largely pictographic and used almost exclusively for institutional bookkeeping. The tablet is now held at Cornell University and is badly broken, with several signs either lost or illegible, making a full reading impossible. Its interest lies in documenting the very origins of written record-keeping: anonymous officials tracking allocations centuries before anyone wrote a story or a law.

Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.

Translation · reference

Low confidence
[...], HAL 1 (unit), beer; [vessel-sign]; MU 2 (units), plant(s)/fodder; mound/ruin-mound 3 (units), day; woman; HAL 2×10 (units), child/junior; HAL; woman 2 (units), lord/EN official; TU; [combined sign] 2×10 + 5 (units), ŠITA-vessel/libation object; NAMEŠDA; X (sign unclear) 5 (units) + 1 (higher unit), great/large 1 (unit), [...] [...], [...]

Source: engine:claude-sonnet-4-6 (2026-05-12/v4-interpretation)

Translation · AI engine

read from photo
Low confidence
[...], HAL 1 (unit), beer; [vessel-sign]; MU 2 (units), plant(s)/fodder; mound/ruin-mound 3 (units), day; woman; HAL 2×10 (units), child/junior; HAL; woman 2 (units), lord/EN official; TU; [combined sign] 2×10 + 5 (units), ŠITA-vessel/libation object; NAMEŠDA; X (sign unclear) 5 (units) + 1 (higher unit), great/large 1 (unit), [...] [...], [...]
10 uncertain terms
  • HALProto-cuneiform HAL: conventionally read as related to division/apportionment of goods, but precise administrative function in Uruk period remains debated; could also function as a personal name element.
  • KASZ~b |ZATU714xHI@g~a|The combined sign group is interpreted as a type of beer or beer-related commodity/vessel; the exact product and measure are uncertain.
  • U2~aTypically read as 'plant' or 'herb/fodder'; exact commodity unclear in this context.
  • DU6~bRead as 'mound' or 'ruin-mound' (tell); its precise administrative meaning in this context is uncertain — may be a toponym or determinative.
  • TU~bSign function in this context is unclear; may relate to 'to enter/bring' or be part of a compound sign group.
  • |GIŠxŠU2~a|A compound sign; reading and meaning in this administrative context are uncertain and cannot be verified from the photo.
  • ŠITA~a1Conventionally read as a type of cultic vessel or libation object; exact referent debated.
  • NAMEŠDASign reading tentative; possible title or category of personnel/goods; meaning in Uruk period context is not firmly established.
  • MUIn Uruk period texts MU can denote 'name', 'year', or function as a determinative; precise role here is unclear.
  • GAL~aRead as 'great/large'; may modify a preceding quantity or denote a high-status category, but context is lost due to fragmentation.
Reasoning ↓

The photograph shows a fragmentary clay tablet broken into several pieces (the main inscribed face is the central piece, labeled CUNES 50-11-068 on a side fragment). The surface is heavily eroded and pitted, with at least one perforation/hole through the tablet face visible in the upper-central area. Cuneiform impressions are visible in roughly seven to eight ruled or divided registers on the main face, with round numerical impressions (N01 and N14 types) clearly discernible alongside angular sign-impressions, though resolution and erosion make precise sign identification difficult in several lines. Signs that can broadly be confirmed from the photo include what appear to be circular/round numerical impressions consistent with N01 and N14, and diagonal/angular strokes consistent with proto-cuneiform signs; the HAL, SAL, and EN~a signs are plausible from the transliteration but cannot be individually verified with certainty from this photo. The reverse (bottom large fragment in photo) appears largely blank or too eroded to read. The transliteration's note of HAL (apportionment), SAL (woman/female worker), TUR (child/junior), and EN~a (high official) aligns with typical Uruk-period ration and distribution tablet formats. The sign glossed as |GIŠxŠU2~a| and the X in line 7 cannot be verified from the photo. This is a transliteration-assisted reading; photo confirms general layout and numerical sign types but not individual lexical signs with high confidence.

Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 14, 2026 · 2121 in / 1203 out tokens

Why it matters

Transliteration

[...] , HAL
1(N30~a) , KASZ~b |ZATU714xHI@g~a| MU
2(N01) , U2~a DU6~b
3(N01) , U4 SAL HAL
2(N14) , TUR HAL# SAL
2(N01) , EN~a TU~b |GISZxSZU2~a|
2(N14) 5(N01) , SZITA~a1 NAMESZDA X
5(N01) 1(N57) , GAL~a
1(N01) , [...]
[...] , [...]

Scholarly note

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Uruk III (ca. 3200-3000 BC)) — CUSAS 01, 162. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

Attribution

Image: Department of Near Eastern Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA (P325250) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-sonnet-4-6 (2026-05-12/v4-interpretation).

Related tablets

Related sources