Position in chronology
UET 2, 0152
About this tablet
A land-allotment record from the very early city of Ur, written around 2800 BCE in an archaic stage of cuneiform. A scribe tallies parcels of field, each measured in the special area-numeral system and assigned to a titled person — among them a 'chief builder' and officials whose titles are built on the signs for 'great', 'door', and 'mother'. It is bureaucratic bookkeeping from the dawn of urban administration, showing land already being parceled out to named office-holders centuries before Sumerian literature was written down.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
This is a short land ledger. Roughly: one large parcel of farmland goes to the chief doorkeeper (an official with the AMA title); another parcel goes to the chief builder, a man whose name or title reads Gir-a; a somewhat smaller parcel — the last numeral is hard to read — goes to someone called Tur-šur; and a small parcel goes to the chief AMA-official of the door. The list originally continued, but the rest of the tablet is broken away and lost.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engineObverse 2(N14) 1(N22) 2(N01) (units of) field (GAN2), — (for) the chief (GAL) of the door(?) (IG), the AMA-official; 2(N14) 1(N22) (units of field) — (for) the chief builder (GAL ŠIDIM), Gir-a(?); 1(N14) 1(N22) 4(N01)?(units of field) — (for) Tur-šur(?); 2(N22) 1(N01) (units of field) — (for) the chief (GAL) AMA-official of the door(?) (IG); [...] (remainder of the text broken)
Our translation engine — Fable 5. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Engine notes
read from photo10 uncertain terms ↓
- GAN2 — Standard reading for 'field' in later Sumerian; in proto-cuneiform context it likely designates a unit or type of agricultural land, but the exact referent of the quantities is uncertain.
- GAL~a — Read as 'great/senior' modifying the following institutional label; whether it modifies the person, the institution, or forms a compound title is unclear in proto-cuneiform syntax.
- IG~a — Sign identity uncertain; possibly a door/gate sign or an institutional label. Its administrative meaning in this context is not established.
- AMA~b — Likely 'mother' in later Sumerian, but in proto-cuneiform administrative texts could be an institutional title, a designation for a class of personnel, or a commodity label.
- SZIDIM / ŠIDIM — Later Sumerian šidim means 'builder/mason'; use here may indicate a professional category of workers, but proto-cuneiform contexts do not always map directly onto later meanings.
- GIR2~a — Sign possibly related to later GÍR ('dagger/foot'); administrative function here is unclear — could be a commodity, a personal name element, or a process notation.
- TUR — 'Small/junior' — contrasted with GAL 'great/senior'; likely denotes a subordinate grade of personnel or institution.
- SZUR2~b / ŠUR2 — Sign identity uncertain at this period; possibly related to later Sumerian šur₂ ('to rain/pour') or a commodity, but administrative meaning not established.
- N14, N22, N01 — Numerical signs whose precise quantitative values depend on the commodity-counting system in use; the system cannot be determined with certainty from surviving context alone.
- 4(N01@f)? — The '?' in the transliteration signals that the reading of four N01 impressions in line 4 is uncertain; the photograph shows damage in this area and I cannot confirm the count visually.
Reasoning ↓
Visual examination of the photograph: the tablet is a small, rounded clay lenticular/cushion shape typical of early Dynastic Ur administrative tablets. The obverse (center panel in the composite image) shows clearly incised horizontal ruling lines dividing the surface into registers — consistent with an administrative proto-cuneiform format. Several signs are visible: in the upper registers I can make out what appear to be large round impressions (N14-type numerals) alongside smaller circular and wedge impressions (N01/N22 types), and in the lower registers more complex incised signs that are consistent with GAL, AMA, and possibly ŠIDIM. The surface is cracked and the upper portion of the tablet (top fragment in the composite) is broken away, creating a lacuna that matches the missing or partially legible signs in the transliteration. The reverse (lower panels) appears largely blank or very lightly marked, consistent with the transliteration showing content only on the obverse. The museum label 'UM 37-7-040 / U12885 / 37-7-310' is visible in the bottom view. The sign readings largely align with the provided transliteration; I cannot independently verify the precise numerical impressions at the resolution available, and the TUR and ŠUR2 signs in line 4 are in a damaged area where I cannot confidently confirm the 4(N01) reading. The GAL and AMA-type signs in lines 2 and 5 are visually consistent with the transliteration. No significant discrepancies detected, but the low resolution and surface cracking prevent full visual confirmation.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 16, 2026 · 2331 in / 1205 out tokens
Transliteration
2(N14@f) 1(N22) 2(N01@f) , GAN2 , GAL~a IG~a AMA~b 2(N14@f) 1(N22@f) , GAL~a SZIDIM GIR2~a A 1(N14@f) 1(N22@f) 4(N01@f)? , TUR SZUR2~b 2(N22@f) 1(N01@f) , GAL~a AMA~b IG~a , [...]
Scholarly note
Catalogue entry from CDLI (ED I-II (ca. 2900-2700 BC)) — UET 2, 0152. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).
Attribution
Image: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (P005735) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-fable-5 (2026-07-12/v7-evolved).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
A window into the world's first total state. The Ur III administration tracked every animal, every worker, every shekel — for a population in the millions. The level of paperwork was not exceeded until the modern era.