Position in chronology
UET 2, 0169a + 0182b
About this tablet
A badly broken administrative tablet from Early Dynastic Ur, one of the very early economic records excavated at the ancient city (modern Tell Muqayyar). What survives are scraps of an account: a quantity of ten of some lost commodity, a single unit of a wood product associated with a well or pit and an institution written with the NUN sign, and repeated 'day 1' date notations. It shows bookkeeping in its infancy — numbers, goods, and dates pressed into clay some 4,600 years ago — though the transaction itself is lost to the breaks.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
This is a ledger fragment. One entry records ten of something — the item's name is broken away — dated to the first day. A second entry also carries a 'day 1' date, but its contents are gone. Two more lines are too damaged to read at all. Then a legible entry: one unit of a wood item connected with a well (or pit) belonging to the NUN establishment. A final surviving trace repeats the 'day 1' dating. Everything else — who delivered, who received, what institution kept the account — is lost where the tablet is broken.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engineobverse [...] 10 (units) [...], (on the) 1st day [...] [...] ..., [...] (on the) 1st day [...] ..., [...] [...] ..., [...] (illegible sign) 1 (unit) — wood(?) (of the) well(?) (of the) NUN-institution [...] ..., (on the) 1st day [...]
Our translation engine — Fable 5. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Engine notes
read from photo5 uncertain terms ↓
- |U4×1(N01)| — A composite sign combining U4 (sun/day/time) with a unit numeral impression. In Early Dynastic administrative texts this may denote a time period (e.g., 'one day') or function as a qualifier for a commodity; exact reading here is uncertain due to fragmentation.
- NUN~a — Later Sumerian NUN = 'prince/lord,' but in proto-cuneiform and Early Dynastic administrative contexts it may be a quality or breed classifier for livestock, or a toponym/institutional marker. The ~a allomorph notation indicates a variant form whose precise phonetic and semantic value is debated.
- 1(N14) — N14 is a higher-order unit in the sexagesimal system; its precise quantitative value (10× or 60× N01) depends on the commodity being counted, which cannot be recovered from surviving text.
- GIŠ PU2 — GIŠ is the determinative for wooden objects or trees; PU2 can mean 'well' or 'pit.' Together with NUN~a this may designate a specific type of wooden well-structure or a named resource, but the context is too damaged to be certain.
- X — An unidentified sign in the transliteration, unreadable from both the transliteration and the photograph.
Reasoning ↓
Visual examination of the photograph reveals a multi-fragment tablet presented in several views. The surface is severely abraded and broken across all fragments; the largest central piece shows a cluster of impressed wedges and round impressions consistent with proto-cuneiform/Early Dynastic numerical and sign notation, but individual sign identification at this resolution and preservation level is extremely difficult. The top-left and bottom fragments appear largely plain clay with only faint traces of impressions, corroborating the transliteration's heavy use of lacunae markers. The museum accession numbers (visible on the fragment edges in modern ink: 'Di291B 3/529' and similar) confirm the join of two fragments (0169a + 0182b). On the largest legible face I can tentatively see round impressions (consistent with N01/N14 numerals) and what may be a GIŠ + PU2 sign group, broadly matching the transliteration's line 5. The |U4×1(N01)| composite is a known Early Dynastic sign but cannot be confirmed with certainty from this photograph. No significant discrepancy between photo and transliteration is detectable, though poor preservation prevents positive confirmation of most signs. The glossary entry for NUN~a acknowledging its contested meaning in livestock contexts has been flagged below.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 16, 2026 · 2133 in / 978 out tokens
Transliteration
[...] 1(N14) , |U4x1(N01)| [...] [...] , [...] |U4x1(N01)| [...] , [...] [...] , [...] X 1(N01) , GISZ PU2 NUN~a [...] , |U4x1(N01)| [...]
Scholarly note
Catalogue entry from CDLI (ED I-II (ca. 2900-2700 BC)) — UET 2, 0169a + 0182b. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).
Attribution
Image: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (P005754) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-fable-5 (2026-07-12/v7-evolved).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
A window into the world's first total state. The Ur III administration tracked every animal, every worker, every shekel — for a population in the millions. The level of paperwork was not exceeded until the modern era.