Position in chronology
SAA 14 318. Fragment of a Witness List (ADD 0607)
Translation · reference
High confidence(Beginning destroyed) (r 1) [Witness NN], 'third [man']. (r 2) [Witness NN], ditto. (r 3) [Witness NN], royal bodyguard. (r 4) [Witness NN], Aramean scribe. (r 5) [Witness NN], prefect of the crown prince. (r 6) [Witness NN], ditto ditto. (r 7) [Witness NN], commander-of-50. (r 8) [Witness NN], 'third man'. (r 9) [Witness NN], [...]. (Rest destroyed)
Source: Mattila, R. 2002. Legal Transactions of the Royal Court of Nineveh, Part II: Assurbanipal through Sin-šarru-iškun. SAA 14. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/saa14/P335525/
Why it matters
Transliteration
[IGI mx x x x x LÚ].3-[šú] / [IGI mx x x x x] LÚ.:. <(3-šú)> / [IGI mx x x x x] LÚ.qur-ZAG / [IGI mx x x x x] LÚ.A.BA ar-ma-a.a / [IGI mx x x x x] LÚ.GAR-nu DUMU—MAN / [IGI mx x x x x] LÚ.:. <(GAR-nu)> :. <(DUMU—MAN)> / [IGI mx x x x x] LÚ.GAL—50 / [IGI mx x x x x] LÚ.⸢3-šú⸣ [o] / [IGI mx x x x x] LÚ.[x x x x]
Scholarly note
Neo-Assyrian legal transaction at the royal court of Nineveh, edited by Raija Mattila (SAA 14, 2002). ORACC text P335525.
Attribution
Image: BM — (British Museum, London, UK) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/artifacts, P335525). source
Translation excerpted from Mattila, R. 2002. Legal Transactions of the Royal Court of Nineveh, Part II: Assurbanipal through Sin-šarru-iškun. SAA 14. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/saa14/P335525/.
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.
The oldest surviving law code in human history. The principle that the state — not the wronged family — defines and enforces justice begins here.