Position in chronology
SAA 06 249. (no title) (ADD 0602)
Translation · reference
High confidence(Beginning destroyed) (r 1) Witness Mannu-ki-Arbail, [...]. (r 2) Witness Ilu-[..., ...]. (r 3) Witness Nuhš[aya, porter]. (r 4) Witness Issar-[..., ...] (r 5) Witness Nabû'a, [cohort commander]. (r 6) Witness Qurdi-Issar, [cohort commander]. (r 7) Witness Mamî, cohort commander. (r 8) Witness Nabû-šumu-iškun, [scribe]. (Rest destroyed)
Source: Kwasman, T. & Parpola, S. 1991. Legal Transactions of the Royal Court of Nineveh, Part I: Tiglath-Pileser III through Esarhaddon. SAA 6. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/saa06/P335521/
Why it matters
Transliteration
IGI mman-nu—ki—⸢arba⸣-[ìl x x x x] / IGI mDINGIR—lu-[x x x x x x x] / IGI mḪÉ.NUN-[a.a LÚ.Ì.DU₈] / IGI md15—[x x x x x x x] / IGI mdPA-u-[a LÚ.GAL—KA.KÉŠ] / IGI mqur-di—d15 LÚ.[GAL—KA.KÉŠ] / IGI mma-mì-i LÚ.GAL—KA.⸢KÉŠ⸣ / IGI mdPA—MU—GAR-un [LÚ.A.BA]
Scholarly note
Neo-Assyrian legal transaction at the royal court of Nineveh, edited by Theodore Kwasman & Simo Parpola (SAA 6, 1991). ORACC text P335521.
Attribution
Image: BM — (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/artifacts, P335521). source
Translation excerpted from Kwasman, T. & Parpola, S. 1991. Legal Transactions of the Royal Court of Nineveh, Part I: Tiglath-Pileser III through Esarhaddon. SAA 6. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/saa06/P335521/.
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.
The oldest surviving law code in human history. The principle that the state — not the wronged family — defines and enforces justice begins here.