Position in chronology
SAA 06 131. A Fragmentary Purchase Document (695-XI) (ADD 0569)
Translation — scholar edition
SAA 6(Beginning destroyed) (r 1) [He shall] p[ay x minas] of silver (and) one mina of gol[d to] Ninurta residing in Calah, [and shall return] the money tenfold to its [owners]. He shall cont[est] in his lawsuit [and] not succeed. (r 6) Witness Himarî, [...]. (r 7) Witness Urda-ilani, [...]. (r 8) Witness Inurta-kibsi-u[ṣur, ...] of the governor. (r 10) Witness Tabli[...]. (r 11) Month Shebat (XI), [...]th day, eponym year of Aššur-be[lu-uṣur], governor of [Šahuppa]. (r 14) Witness Nušku-il[a'i ...].
State Archives of Assyria, volume 6 — scholar edition (ORACC).
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Transliteration
[x MA.NA] KUG.UD 01 MA.NA KUG.⸢GI⸣ / [a-na d]MAŠ a-šib URU.kàl-ḫi ⸢SUM⸣-[an] / kas-pu a-na 10-MEŠ-te a-na ⸢EN⸣-[MEŠ-šú] / [GUR] ina de-ni-šú DUG₄.DUG₄-[ma] / la i-laq-[qi] / IGI mḫi-ma-ri-i LÚv.[x x] / IGI mARAD—DINGIR-MEŠ-ni [LÚv.x x] / IGI mdMAŠ—kib-su—⸢PAB⸣ [LÚv.x x] / ša LÚv.EN.NAM / IGI mtab-li-[x x] / ITI.ZÍZ UD [x-KAM] / lim-me maš-šur—⸢EN⸣—[PAB] / LÚv.GAR.KUR [URU.šá-ḫup-pa] / IGI mdPA.TÚG—⸢DINGIR*⸣-[a.a]
Scholarly note
Neo-Assyrian legal transaction at the royal court of Nineveh, edited by Theodore Kwasman & Simo Parpola (SAA 6, 1991). ORACC text P335495.
Attribution
Image: BM — (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.earth/artifacts, P335495). source
Translation excerpted from Kwasman, T. & Parpola, S. 1991. Legal Transactions of the Royal Court of Nineveh, Part I: Tiglath-Pileser III through Esarhaddon. SAA 6. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/saa06/P335495/.
Related tablets
Related sources
An early example of administrative writing from Uruk. Its fragmentary numerical entries and commodity signs document record-keeping during the formative period of writing.
An early surviving historical monument that joins named rulers, a territorial dispute and religious oaths. It shows how a city-state turned victory into a lasting public claim, without establishing that this was the first recorded conflict.
Among the oldest surviving written law collections. It provides an early witness to royal justice and specified compensation, rather than a starting date for law itself.